By Yoshiaki Hattori and Masami Tamura2024-03-06T15:00:00
Prior to the introduction of new guidance, before including Japanese participants into a multi-regional clinical trial (MRCT), the sponsor needed to conduct a standalone Japanese phase I study to ensure no significant difference in safety/pharmacokinetics (PK) between Japanese and non-Japanese participants. This requirement has been considered an obstacle for non-Japanese companies to conduct MRCTs including Japanese participants, which can lead to drug lag* and drug loss* in Japan. Based on this, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)† took this situation seriously and reviewed the requirement for standalone Japanese Phase I trials.
Log in now using your MyTOPRA credentials, for unlimited access to all Regulatory Rapporteur journal articles, the online archive and latest industry news and podcasts.
Renew your TOPRA membership for 2026 here.
If you are not a TOPRA member but have already created an account to access limited free content, log in here using your registered user email and password.
LoginBecome a TOPRA member and join our global regulatory affairs community.
Register now to continue to access industry news, editorials and podcasts plus one member-only journal article each month.
The peer-reviewed journal, published 11 times per year and available free to TOPRA members.
The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs
TOPRA office
TOPRA Publishing, Third floor, City Reach, 5 Greenwich View Place, London E14 9NN, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7510 2560
Email: publications@topra.org
TOPRA AISBL
Blvd du Souverain 280, 1160 Brussels, Belgium
Tel: +32 (0) 2 808 72 70
Site powered by Webvision Cloud